Showing posts with label Hydro One. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hydro One. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Hydro One leaves sick man in the dark

Really, honestly, if all you people who live in the country would just LEAVE already and get a 400-square-foot condo in Toronto, these stories wouldn't happen.

Hydro One removes transformer, leaves sick man in dark

Simon Kent
By ,Toronto Sun
  Updated:
TORONTO - Hydro One, how could you?
Tony Kenny is too polite to ask but somebody has to pose the question.
On Sept. 5 he contacted the power utility to complain about frequent, unexplained power outages at his small farm just outside Peterborough in the community of Bailieboro.
Kenny pointed out that the power transformer on his property was failing and he wrote them it was “ancient ... along with the original poles which clearly say ‘Property of Ontario Hydro.’ ”
Kenny respectfully asked for a little help. He wrote: “Because Hydro powers the only source for water for myself, a necessity of life, and animals on the farm, could you please look into replacing the transformer and poles before there is a bigger problem?”
The bigger problem being that the supply of power is not just a necessity of life for his animals, there is another reason. Kenny lives on a disability pension.
He has a chronic heart condition called dilated cardiomyopathy. It means he has medical needs that can only be sustained by the provision of electricity on a regular, 24/7 basis.
Kenny lives at the constant risk of cardiac arrhythmia and/or stoke. This has been compounded with late-onset adult diabetes, meaning he cannot work and Kenny’s only source of income is the Ontario Disability Support Program.
This was all outlined in his written plea to Hydro One for a better supply of electricity.
Two days later he had his reply.
The utility wrote to tell the 51-year-old they couldn’t help.
“Thank you for contacting us about power outages in your area,” the letter opened.
“Unfortunately, Hydro One cannot control all interference on our system which can cause power interruptions or voltage irregularities and from time to time, short power outages will occur on the system. Therefore, we cannot guarantee a constant supply of electricity.
“We strongly advise anyone that is dependent on electrically powered medical equipment to have a back-up generation source or alternative arrangements in the event of a power outage.
“As per our conditions of service, Hydro One cannot guarantee a continuous or constant supply of power and will not be liable for any damages caused by lack of power, a power outage or surge.”
It didn’t end there. On Sept. 10, Kenny claims without his knowledge and without notice or permission to enter his property, Hydro One workers arrived and took the transformer away.
They didn’t install a new one in its place.
Kenny has been in the dark ever since — literally and figuratively — and carts water by hand in the absence of power for his electric pumps.
“I don’t know what to do now,” Kenny said. “I contacted my MPP’s office and Jeff Leal couldn’t help. I live on my own and worry what would happen if my health started failing and I couldn’t raise help.
“I have lived here since 1995 and never had a problem with Hydro One, always paid my bills, but as soon as I complained, that was it.
“Nobody from Hydro One has even contacted me and given me an explanation for their actions.”
When the Toronto Sun approached the utility about the Kenny case, a Hydro One spokesman said they would only offer a comment if Kenny supplied a signed disclosure form via e-mail to look into his account.
“Which is great, but I don’t have the power on so I have no computer — so how can I fulfil that request?” Kenny retorted.
In a final twist, Kenny says there is one reminder of his dealings with Hydro One to remind him of the utility’s unintended but ironic approach to customer service.
There on the pole where the old transformer used to stand is a brand new smart meter; alone, unused and ultimately totally useless.
As Tony Kenny is willing to attest, much like Hydro One itself.
***************

Rural dwellers are not the only consumers who feel powerless when it comes to Hydro One.
Cottagers allege they suffer discriminatory pricing at the hands of the monopoly supplier, according to Rose Mary Rosada.
“If your cottage is not your primary residence ... you are billed for delivery charges at approximately 2 1/2 times that of a residence where the occupants live full time, even if they are next door to you, the cottager,” she said.
“On the road where our vacation property is, there are about 12 homes — four of which are full-time residents and the other eight are seasonal.
“Why is it Hydro One’s business whether this is my full-time or part-time residence (my time is split 50/50 at both) ... Bell Canada charges the same rate no matter how many residences you own.
“The only way Hydro One will change the way they bill my vacation property is if I have my mailing address for Canada Revenue Agency, my driver’s licence, etc. changed to my vacation property address.
“It’s none of Hydro One’s business and this is an invasion of my privacy on their part to be demanding this.”
Hydro One would not directly address the claim of discriminatory pricing other than to direct us to their statement on seasonal property pricing versus year-round home.
It says in part: “A delivery rate is the price you pay to have your electricity delivered to your seasonal residence. If you have a second home such as a cottage, chalets or camp area that is serviced by Hydro One you are a seasonal customer.”
The understanding being that seasonal means you pay more.
Why do they do that? Because they can. As a monopoly, Hydro One can do whatever it likes.




Article any source

Monday, September 16, 2013

Veteran battles Hydro One over "smart" meters

Those of us who have to deal with Hydro One know how heavy-handed the power supplier can be. Here's what's happening when one Ontario resident decided to stand up to them.

Veteran battles Hydro One over meter

211
Simon Kent
By ,Toronto Sun
First posted: | Updated:
Let’s start with a quick quiz.
Do you think your home is your castle, protected under common law as yours and yours alone?
Further, do you think you hold the right to say who enters your property and the terms under which they do?
Answer “yes” to both questions?
Maybe it’s time to think again.
As Ontario householders are finding, utility company Hydro One reserves absolute privilege to enter your private property whenever a representative sees fit.The reason they want access is to install new electronic smart meters, now being rolled out across the province as part of a multi-million dollar program funded by the taxpayers of Ontario.
For various legitimate reasons, including health, privacy and safety, many people are opposed to the forced installation of this new wireless metering system. But they’re discovering they have no way of seeking an exemption or opting out.
Like Second World War veteran Russell Irwin. The 91-year-old says the company replaced his old meter with a new digital version directly against his wishes and without permission.
This is what happened to Irwin.
“The Hydro people first came one day and we told them to get out and stay out,” Irwin said. “The next Sunday morning they snuck back in and put the Smart meter in anyway.“They said they’ve got every right to do these things but they should have asked first whether we want the new smart meter or not.
“The answer would have been obviously no.”
Mr. Irwin has since refused to pay any more bills until the old meter is returned and the company offers an apology.Hydro One’s response has been to inform him to be prepared to have his power cut off by Tuesday.
Irwin is ready for a long battle with the utility giant and his personal history reveals why he is determined not to give in.
It’s just not in his nature.
The former Canadian Grenadier Guard served as a tank driver in the Second World War as a member of the 22nd Canadian Armoured Regiment (CAR), a unit of 4th Canadian (Armoured) Division.
He deployed to Normandy in July 1944 and from that time until VE Day on May 8, 1945, was with 22 CAR in battles around the Falaise Pocket in France, in Belgium, the Netherlands and finally across the Rhine.On his return, Irwin continued to serve but in a different capacity. He lived in Toronto, raised a family and dedicated 35 years of his life saving others as a firefighter paramedic before retiring to his farm at Orangeville.
The last thing he says he wants to do is spend his remaining years fighting the Hydro, but as his son-in-law Dwayne Huxted explains, he has no choice.“Since the installation of the new meter, two of my father-in-law’s computers have stopped working while the Internet has been disconnecting regularly,” Huxted said. “None of that was happening prior.He also has had a noticeable increase in intensity of ringing in the ears and balance problems, both of which were originally attributed to his war service.”
Complaints over the forced installation and impending power cut off have been filed with the Ombudsman, Hydro One and the Ontario Energy Board but to no avail; the utility remains committed to installing the meters over any consumer resistance.Around 1.4 million wireless meters have been placed on homes and apartments throughout the province. The aim of the McGuinty government initiative was to help reduce energy consumption by showing consumers how to save money in off-peak hours. Smart meters for smart usage is the claim.
Opponents claim the new meters don’t just monitor their usage, but have the potential in the future to restrict or cut power supply to individual appliances as well as collect information on usage to be shared without the consent or knowledge of the consumer.For its part Hydro One, refused a request to reveal whether or not direct permission was sought to enter Mr. Irwin’s rural estate to fit the new meter.
A spokesman offered this response to the inquiry.“The Electricity Act (Section 40) and Hydro One’s Conditions of Service permit us to maintain and replace our meter at our customers’ premises. A customer does not need to be home for the installation to take place.”
Not good enough, said Dwayne Huxted. He is worried that his father-in-law will be taken off grid Tuesday and faces a winter without power.He also maintains that repeated requests for Hydro One to send a copy of the original contact had been denied, making it almost impossible to determine their legal standing.
“We say the meter was installed without consent, it is an invasion of privacy, it has the ability to collect information about us and our home that is ours alone and then it is communicated wirelessly and possibly on-sold to any number of anonymous organizations or corporations.
“It also looks like needless Hydro One bullying of a war veteran who is simply standing up for his rights and getting bulldozed by a vast, anonymous state service provider for his troubles.
“It looks bad because it is bad.”
Article any source

Sunday, September 8, 2013

Hydro One, Energy Ministers: getting 'smarter'? You be the judge!




Three bills in three weeks from Hydro One and a new line on the bill: “Miscellaneous Adjustment” got this writer wondering, why?  The first bill came with an insert with the heading “Important Information about your enclosed Hydro One bill” and went on to explain that after they had “changed the meter at your premises, we experienced an issue which prevented the data from your meter from being processed in a timely manner in our system.”   The meter they changed was a “smart meter” Hydro One installed a few years ago, so I assume this is a “smarter” meter.  Calling the number on the insert allowed me to confirm with Hydro One  that the meter change was due to a “communication problem.”
   The upsetting part of the final bill is that when the all-in price of my power is calculated (including the costs of electricity, delivery, regulatory and debt retirement charge) it turned out to be 29 cents a kilowatt hour (kWh) and when I looked at my bill from November 2008 the all in charge was 16.5 cents a kWh.  So in less than five years, the price had risen by 81%.
   We’re doing our best to be responsible power consumers: we consumed less power than before and 71% of the billed electricity was in “off-peak” hours. 
   If one looks back this is what then Premier McGuinty said in his Throne speech of October 12, 2005 about smart meters: “Consumers can look forward to getting smart meters that will help them save money by telling them when they can pay less.
    An 81-% increase? Sounds like another broken government promise!
   Those who have Hydro One as their local distribution company (LDC) will recall that only a few months ago, they sent another insert about a “new billing system”  which allows them to bill on a “real time” basis.   In effect this was a $160-million grab from ratepayers, perhaps to ensure their profits grow and that they can continue to pay dividends to the Province ($370 million in 2012).  Profitability however, doesn't cover off employee pension and benefit requirements as noted by DBRS, the Canadian bond rating agency, who listed Hydro One as # 8 on their recent list of worst funded pensions in Canada. Perhaps they should be funding their pension fund instead of making big dividend payments to the Ontario Ministry of Finance, but that might force Finance Minister Sousa to make some tough spending decisions.
   My comments on “smart meters” are not new: back in July 2010I pointed out that in a 3,400-page submission by Hydro One for a rate increase, the installed cost per smart meter was $700.54. That was confirmed by an exchange with a Hydro One officer.  Now, the smart meters are having to be replaced? And not for the first time: Hydro One has needed to replace smart meters back in 2010 when the Newmarket Eracarried an article about meter replacement in Keswick, Sutton and Mount Albert. My suspicion is that the form letter in our recent bill wasn't the only one: who else in Prince Edward County and other parts of the province got it?
  So, now,  one wonders about the promises made for those smart meters. At $700.54 cents per meter the cost of replacing the old analog meter at our place is now $1,400.00; the Hydro One 2012 Annual Report indicates they are charging $1.52 per month as a recovery cost.  At that rate, it will take them 76 years to recover their costs. Will Hydro One be spending hundreds of millions each year on “smart meters” instead of upgrading the important infrastructure such as transmission lines, transformers, etc.?
   An interesting story recently came out of Germany: the German Federal Ministry of Economics published a studyby Ernst & Young which basically concluded, no rollout for smart meters.  Why? Ernst & Young did a cost/benefit study and concluded:
The study comes to the conclusion that smart meters in particular for small consumers are not cost-efficient, as the potential savings would be well below actual costs of smart meters and their operation.”
Cost-benefit analysis and other studies: not necessary for decisions by the Ontario government

   In Ontario we seem to do things differently as was pointed out by the Auditor General in his 2011 report. Jim McCarter said that the initiatives behind the Green Energy and Green Economy Act were not based on a cost-benefit analysis.  While not speaking directly to the issue of “smart meters” and their installation throughout the province this writer believes that the conclusions of a cost-benefit analysis would have reached the same endpoint as the Ernst and Young study completed for Germany.
    When the McGuinty government gave its Throne Speech in 2005, the Ontario Energy Minister (Dwight Duncan) had already issued a directive to the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) dated July 14, 2004to Howard Wetson, Chair, of the OEB (the Ontario Power Authority did not exist at that time) which instructed them to “implement a plan to achieve the government's objectives for the deployment of smart electricity meters. 
   No cost-benefit study was considered and Minister Duncan's directive to the OEB simply had to be “formalized” before the media picked up on the government’s manipulation of the electricity sector without going through the legislature or a hearing before a legislative committee! With a single signature Duncan committed Ontario's ratepayers to pick up a bill for at least $2 billion!
   Several years after that 2005 Throne Speech and the Dwight Duncan directive, Tyler Hamilton (the “expert” commentator as noted by Alicia Johnston in e-mails recently released by the government and commented on by Tom Adams) wrote an article for the October 7, 2010 Toronto Star.  The article was all about “smart meters” and the wonders they would perform for all of the ratepayers in Ontario.  It contained quotes from an IBM “technology consultant” including this one:  “ ‘Right now, Ontario is a world leader in the smart grid and smart meter systems,’ he explained. ‘Dozens of utilities around the world are watching what’s going on here. In a way, we have become a micro lab for the rest of the world.’  
    Later on in the article Hamilton makes this comment:  With smart meters…we have a tool that helps us to at least manage our electricity bill and help offset electricity rate increases.”
   Did Tyler Hamilton, the “expert” commentator, really understand what he was endorsing? I believe most ratepayers in the province have received absolutely no benefit from either “smart meters” or the “smart grid” –neither one has done nothing to improve the aging infrastructure in the Province or “help offset electricity rate increases.” 
   Germany, whom we copied on the FIT and MicroFIT programs apparently didn't see it with the clarity of Tyler Hamilton or that IBM technology consultant. 
   Mr. McGuinty is now at Harvard and presumably living in Massachusetts where the average cost of power is about half of what I am being charged. I wonder if he and former Minister Duncan now appreciate the “green” mess they created. 
   Worse, power utilities around the world must now be laughing up their sleeve at the wasted money Ontario's ratepayers are forced to absorb.  The “microlab” referenced by the IBM technology consultant has turned out instead to be an incinerator for our hard earned dollars!

Parker Gallant,
September 7, 2013

Next time, we will look at the “smart grid”
The opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent policies of Wind Concerns Ontario.


Article any source