Showing posts with label Ontario Ministry of Energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ontario Ministry of Energy. Show all posts

Friday, September 20, 2013

Saving money with smart meters: the Liberal promise



On April 19, 2004, the Premier of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty, said in a speech to the Ontario Legislature, “Smart meters, together with more flexible pricing, would allow Ontarians to save money if they run appliances in off-peak hours.”
   A few days ago Rosemary Leclaire, CEO of the Ontario Energy Board (OEB),  delivered the following message in her speech to the  Ontario Energy Association:  “We are using data supplied by a number of utilities to analyze the impact of time-of-use pricing on peak consumption. Early results show that residential customers are cutting their consumption during high price periods and shifting their peak usage until after 7 PM.”
   The two quotes are years apart but are related.  Did we really save money by shifting usage as McGuinty claimed or was that simply political hyperbole?   Since his speech electricity rates have risen 65% and delivery rates even more.  Then, add the HST.
   The Ministry of Energy (MOE) tells us we can save moneywith smart meters:  “Shift electricity use to off-peak periods. With smart meters and time-of-use pricing, you can save money by switching some of your energy use to mid- and off-peak hours when electricity prices are lower.”
   Well, here’s the truth: the money we can save does not come, as McGuinty and the MOE suggest,  from simply adjusting our use of appliances in off-peak hours. No, to really save money, you have to leave the province for at least five months and  head south where electricity rates are much lower (See the EIA reported  all-in electricity rates here.).
   This sad truth was revealed to me in an e-mail sent by someone with an interest in my writings about the Ontario electricity sector.  He described how he and his wife save money by moving to Florida for five months every year.  In fact, he said, their travel costs are paid for with the money saved by leaving Ontario.   Here is what he said.

February in Florida the coolest month I used electric heat, electric stove, and electric water heater, plus TV, microwave, lights, computer, radio etc.  I used 479 KW at a gross cost of $48.89. That's 10 cents per kW. Meanwhile in Ontario my house at 9 degrees C with natural gas using fans, fridge on, sump pump.  Telephone and clocks on stove, microwave and radio getting power. I used 133 kW for a cost of $59.64 in an empty house. That's 44 cents a kW. When the house is occupied I use about 700 kW per month. Higher in the cooler months, I would estimate much higher in the cold ones. In April- May 2013, I used 752 kW for a gross charge of 176.00 or .234 cents a kW.
So if my winter costs were the same as April - May, my five-and-a-half-month cost is $968.  My five-and-a-half-month Florida cost averages $30.00 or $165 US.  I don't really know what my February bill would be if I stayed home--I can only assume it would be more than $176.00  If I do the Florida trip in one night, my expenses down and back are around $500 for gas, motel and
food.

Florida is not the cheapest state for US electricity rates (it’s 16% under the US average) but the foregoing does highlight the cost of electricity in Ontario versus much of the US East Coast.   Those states are ones that Ontario often competes with for jobs. 
   Curiously, a side issue of the Florida story is that the principal provider of electricity is Florida Light and Power (FLP) a subsidiary of Juno, FL-based NextEra.  The company has several contracts with the Ontario Power Authority for industrial wind projects and plans to develop 600 MW in Ontario.
   One can only conclude that the Ontario Government's handling of the energy portfolio in Ontario has driven jobs south, attracted foreign companies looking for big payoffs, granted those companies carte blanche to kill, harm and harass our birds, bats and turtles, reduced our property values, caused health problems in rural communities, and, yes, driven our electricity bills up. 
   In the end it appears that McGuinty spoke the truth--he just didn't tell us we would have to leave our province for five months to “save money”. 

Parker Gallant,
September 18, 2013
PS:  NextEra contributed the maximum amount ($9,300) to the Ontario Liberal Party in both 2011 and 2012.

The opinions expressed are those of the writer and not necessarily Wind Concerns Ontario policy.

Article any source

Thursday, September 12, 2013

The Long-Term Energy Plan consultation in Sault St Marie: joke

The North has seemed to be weeping copiously, perhaps for the desecration of the Great Spirit Island which is currently being spiked with icons of greed energy.  Torrents of rain have torn out roads and flooded already sodden low areas. Public enthusiasm for the Long Term Energy Plan "engagement" in Sault Ste Marie was dampened, though not a complete washout.
http://www.saultstar.com/2013/09/10/states-of-emergency-called-in-outlying-municipalities-motorcyclist-dead

As per usual, invited stakeholders (listed below) enjoyed the opportunity for a sit down presentation, refreshments and round table discussion; the poster board community walk-through format, insultingly reminiscent of greed energy developers' public cons in form and content, awaited the common folk despite advise to the contrary.  The Ministry of Energy team did graciously extend a last minute invitation to this loitering individual who was between an earlier appointment and hours of Wifi work in a lobby armchair.  The opportunity to observe and compare was not to be missed...

After a brief intro, presentation by the OPA and opportunity to mingle, the various labelled tables attracted participants eager to give input.  NUCLEAR had plenty of space.  Only Deucksoo Lee, of the Korean engineering firm KEPCO, was in conversation with the moderator; storm-delayed, Steven Jellich later joined us.  His affiliation with Union Gas inclined him to be a spoiler for nuclear, not wanting the evaluation of nuclear to be entirely lacking in consideration of emissions and concerned about expense of new build.

After a break the Renewables and transmission table filled, possibly with fewer vested interests because after introductions there was a lengthy pause when the moderator read from the "Making Choices" section on renewables the statement:
"Looking beyond 2018, what goal should Ontario set to ensure that non-hydro renewable energy continues to play an important role in meeting Ontario's supply needs?"

This reporter, taking exception to the idea that the unreliables are playing an important role used Prince Wind Farm's chronic inability to match peak production with Ontario's demand as handy evidence that meeting Ontario's supply needs with wind is wishful thinking.  Prince Township Reeve Ken Lamming interjected that windfarms are a waste of space, suggesting existing infrastructure should be refurbished or converted to gain supply efficiencies without more environmental damage.

The moderator's claim of CO2 abatement benefits was rebuffed with the BENTEK Energy reports, the IESO rep at the table tried to suggest Ontario's situation might be different...

The Deputy Energy Minister was at a simultaneously held LTEP meeting in Kenora so his assistant in attendance here was the target for an almost constant stream of objection to inadequacies, claims and statements from the Ministry Of Energy.  He became the focus of even more attention at the evening session when determined stewards of Lake Superior braved the flooding and washouts to make sure Ministry was hearing our concerns about increased fire risks, lack of performance bonds on decommissioning plans, lack of Democracy, lack of honest costing for the unreliables, the fallacy of jobs from wind farms...

EBR comments needed… as a representative of the Ministry of Energy said, while our objections and arguments will stay with them and influence their thinking while preparing recommendations and position papers for the Minister, their voice counts for much less than that of the voters - us.  


So please submit your comments to the EBR Registry Number: 011-9490, Title: Making Choices: Reviewing Ontario’s Long-Term Energy Plan
The comment period for this notice has been extended by 7 days to September 16, 2013, to allow for additional consultation.
To submit a comment online, go to http://tinyurl.com/l8lepsr
All comments on this proposal must be directed to:

Julie Green
0Senior Policy Advisor
Ministry of Energy
Regulatory Affairs and Strategic Policy
Strategic Policy Branch
880 Bay Street
2nd floor
Toronto Ontario
M7A 2C1
List of stakeholders invited to the Sault Ste Marie afternoon session:
Stephen Bieda: Sun Country Highways Ltd/Golden Horseshoe Electric Vehicle Association
Keith Clarida: Clarida's
Tim Janzen: MET Energy Systems
Steven Jelich: Union Gas
Daniel Kaute: Environmental Waste International
Colin Kirkwood: Sault College
Dawn Lambe: Biomass Innovation Centre - Nipissing U
Ken Lamming: Prince Township
Tim Lavoie: Algoma POwer - Utilities- Distribution
Deucksoo Lee: KEPCO Engineering & Construction Company Inc.
Joe Maure: Ministry of Natural Resources
Jason Naccarato: Sault Ste Marie Innovation Centre
Dominic Parrella: PUC Distribution Inc.
Lory Patteri: Town of Bruce Mines
Martin Pochtaruk: Helene Inc
Robert Reid: M-Sci Technologies Inc./Sault Ste Marie Chamber of Commerce/Sault Ste Marie Economic Development Corp
Dan Richards: Algoma Power Inc - Utilities - Distribution
Trevor Sawchyn: Solar Logix Sault Ste Marie
Megan Smith: Ministry of Natural Resources
Alan Spacek: Town of Kapuskasing
Grant Taibossigai: M'Cheeging First Nation
Jim Tait: Great Lakes Power Transmission

Many thanks to those of you who braved the elements to attend the public evening session and share your concerns, objections and arguments with the representatives from the Ministry of Energy!


Article any source